We should be careful comparing our 'relatively' straight and equal length limb bows to Yumis. Look at them unbraced... i.e. each limb's length, shape, and amount of reflex relative to the handle. Much different animal. A Yumi could never balance the way I like.
I make my bows with a slightly shorter lower limb for two main reasons.
1. It perfectly balances it in the bow hand while carrying, balances the same canting any degree, while swiveling, pointing, following moving targets. It's as effortless and natural as pointing a finger. Symmetrical bows aren't balanced like that... for me. Some folks don't notice the difference, but it screams at me.
2. It moves the bow center and static balance point upwards slightly, nearer my bow hand and string hand fulcrums. This makes it possible to dynamically balance the bow very early in the draw.... with no, or a very, very minimal sliding of the fulcrum under the bow hand during the draw.
In other words, the static balance point, bow hand fulcrum, string hand fulcrum, and dynamic balance point are all in, and stay in, exact or very close alignment... beginning to end... and I very much appreciate the effects this has on how the bow carries, points, balances and feels throughout the entire draw, feels at the shot, and affects the arrow.
It's not 'all in the tiller', as I've heard touted many times. Parts of the balancing act are determined in large part by geometry, and if it's to be addressed, needs addressed in the design/layout.