My thoughts.... We all share the same passion. We come from different areas and walks of life, but all have a desire to take a raw chunk of wood, horn, or bamboo and make it bend suitable to cast an arrow.
I love the native bows, particularly the eastern Cherokee and creek styles. My personal taste is a modestly finished bow, stiff to slightly bending in a very small handle section. I make that bow very much personalized to me, with no desire to replicate any other style or historically accurate artifact. When I rough that bow out of a tree split stave and spend hours making it bend evenly, and put a string on it......that is a primitive bow regardless of the material it is strung with or oil it wears. I put little no thought into the mathematical aspect of it..... There are those that do, and they do so for the purpose of getting the very most out of the raw natural material they are working with.
The bows they make are also primitive.
I would wager that those of our ancestors that were truly masters at making bows, took their own approach to achieve a fast shooting, low set, long lasting bow.
My heart will always lie in the more simple bows, but I’m in awe of the works of art others produce, and do not believe that they are any less primitive in function or base materials.
I think we are a small community and all have so much in common whether we use tite bond or hide glue.
I want to see all the bows that y’all can make, from the simplest sapling D bow to the elegant recurves.