It's a free market. The consumer sets the rules. If you've ever heard the expression"you get what you pay for". That holds true here. The majority of the public chose to buy the cheap stuff that walmart based its business model on. (That would be cheap Chinese whares) The short sightedness of that mass decision also produced the side effect of "you get the business where you spent your money and lose the businesses that you didn't support". In my town, when walmart went in, the downtown businesses increased there revenue. The walmart drew in people from the small towns surrounding us and they shopped the downtown area since they were already in town. That was the effect on my town. The surrounding towns that the influx of consumers came from, yep you guessed it, their businesses folded up like cheap suits. Was that walmart's fault? Nope, it's the consumers fault. I have no animosity towards a business that succeeds by legal means. As far as taxpayer subsidy goes, anybody care to guess how much goes to subsidize agriculture? Should we quit eating to boycott farmers? I jest of course. My livelihood is for the most part agriculture. Since I haul ag products and chemicals for the farming industry, I guess I'm indirectly subsidized as well. Now I hate myself. Man, what a tangled web we weave. The point is the public got what the public paid for. Crying about it now, doesn't turn back the clock. I support small businesses the best I can, but if I need something they don't carry, it sure is handy having that walmart on the hill. Josh