Author Topic: questions on hand shock pics added  (Read 2096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carson (CMB)

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,319
Re: questions on hand shock pics added
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2013, 08:28:39 pm »
Yup, tips look heavy.  I tend to think heavy tips cause even more hand shock on longer bows., but could be wrong. 
"The bow is the old first lyre,
the mono chord, the initial rune of fine art
The humanities grew out from archery as a flower from a seed
No sooner did the soft, sweet note of the bow-string charm the ear of genius than music was born, and from music came poetry and painting and..." Maurice Thompso

Offline Pappy

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 32,198
  • if you have to ask you wouldn't understand ,Tenn.
Re: questions on hand shock pics added
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2013, 07:57:26 am »
Good looking bend,if the string took the shock out I would just shoot the heck out of it. :) Looking forward to seeing it all dolled up. :)
   Pappy
Clarksville,Tennessee
TwinOaks Bowhunters
Life is Good

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: questions on hand shock pics added
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2013, 11:50:15 am »
Heavy tips, heavy outer limbs, uneven tiller, too much bend in the handle, stretchy strings, and very light arrows (like CF arrows) will all contribute to handshock. Anything which causes excess vibration. I made a hickory backed osage Holmegaard bow a few years back, and the handshock was so bad, it would loosen your fillings. Brutal. Very unpleasant to shoot. Heavier arrows helped, but not much.