Author Topic: Long bow TILLER CHECK.  (Read 1804 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yellowstave

  • Member
  • Posts: 131
Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« on: April 27, 2018, 08:59:46 pm »
70 inch ttt. 60 lb at 26.5 inches. I love this thing already.

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,633
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2018, 09:01:19 pm »
Outer section of the right limb is stiff.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline Yellowstave

  • Member
  • Posts: 131
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2018, 09:16:05 pm »
Hows this look pat. I shave a little more there.

Offline willie

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,268
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2018, 09:55:06 pm »
those rolly backed staves are hard to judge. if you have photoshop skills, you might try to overlay each outer at brace on top of the same outer at full draw and compare.

Offline Tim Baker

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2018, 12:16:53 am »
Do you have a front-view of the bow? Even with pyramid limbs bows are generally faster and have less hand shock if the mid limbs bend more than the inner limbs. It's good to get this established early on so the inner limbs, which store most of the energy, are not over-stressed when taken to full or near full draw. Such over-stressing leads to high hysteresis, an efficiency robber.

Offline Bayou Ben

  • Member
  • Posts: 661
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2018, 12:38:01 am »
Tim, I’m not sure you meant to, but that perfectly explains to me why the R/D is such an efficient design.

Offline Yellowstave

  • Member
  • Posts: 131
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2018, 12:49:10 am »
Front view

Offline Hawkdancer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,040
Re: Long bow TILLER CHECK.
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2018, 10:20:08 pm »
I think may not be gnarly,  but it sure has character! :BB
Hawkdancer
Life is far too serious to be taken that way!
Jerry