The son was obviously deranged. I don't think that archery in general is going to take a hit over this.
Did gun owners get a break when deranged shooters were splashed all over the news?
We archers once had very high moral ground, back in the days when we were working to get archery seasons established. We spoke of how we believed in a more stringent definition of fair chase and how we were committed to hunting rather than simply killing game. Look at the modern hunting shows now on dozens of channels...it's all about killing, killing the biggest, killing the fastest, killing the furthest away, killing
EXTREME!
Even in our own ranks and within this thread, the bow is already equated as a
murder weapon with the implication that access should be limited "It is done, it is a fact, as to the perp, it isn't a question of sane or insane it's a question of why did he have access to the murder weapon if he is truely unbalanced in the head?" Are we to now have legislation introduced requiring bows have "string locks" on them, mandatory storage in locked "bow safes", or a National bow registration?
Yes, I readily admit that I am blowing this up a little, and I apologize if it sounds as if I am picking on Cyrille and Gordon. I am not, I am just using their quotes to make my point. The fact remains, this made national news and was read by millions of non-archery persons. How many of those people have had a small shift in their opinion of bowhunters? Do you think that shift was toward the positive or negative? How is archery going to be perceived in the future by these same persons? These same persons that vote and have access to their lawmaker's ears?
My point, how many years of work by thousands of ethical archers can one single incident by one single person undo? It's amazing how easy it is to tear down compared to building up. I'm just asking for a call to arms from fellow Forum members to uphold the high standards of ethics set by those archers that came before us.