Just like the topic suggests. What effect (spine wise) does shooting a 160g tip than a 125? I know it will weaken it, but the question is how much?
The reason I am asking is I was having a tough time getting my arrows set up. The chart I was using said at 26 @ 55-60 # draw weight I should get 50-55# shafts. At 27@55-60 I should get 55-60# shafts so I opted for the heavy shafts because I knew that I could leave them a little longer if I had to and being at 26.5" on draw length that should put right in range. Be advised I have never really got a set of arrows set up right up to this point. So I went back and put the bow on the scale and sure enough its at 58# at 26.5. So the only thing I could think of was to go back and remeasure my draw length. Guess what? I only pull 25". Don't ask me how I got measured wrong the first time when I got started, call it inexperience. I guess I just did'nt think it was rocket science to have someone mark the shaft at the back of the bow at full draw and then measure the mark. But apparently that is the case. So now I am trying to make the adjustment to set up the arrows to be for 53@ 25 which if my chart is correct, should be a 40-45. So if someone that knows doesn't mind chiming in, here is what I have for materials. 11/32 POC 1coat stain and 3 coats laquer finish so they are a little thicker in diameter. As I understand it, each inch over 28" is 5# less in spine from the arrow was spined at by the supplier. Correct? So a 56# spine at 29" would be 51 and at 30 it would be 46. Correct? How much spine do I loose with just shooting a 160g tip. The benefit I could see is it adds weight overall and especially in the tips which improves my extreme FOC which should equate into better penetration if what Dr Ashby has reported in his broadhead penetration tests. I know this was long winded but its where I'm at and look forward to some other peoples informed perspectives. Thanks Danny