I made a bow for the bow trade last year, and when I was putting the final shots thru it, it popped a splinter. it was too long, and it was 59#@28" with static recurves...osage. The rings are good, but not overly thick...I'd say "average" thickness.
I'm going to shorten this bow 6" and sinew back it.
Should I simply string it, open up the crack, drizzle some TB3 in it, and clamp it down...then proceed with the shortening and sinew backing.....OR
Should I chase the next ring down...removing the current violated back and splinter...then proceed with the shortening and sinew backing?
I'm leaning toward re-backing with the next ring down. I have plenty of weight as is, I will be gaining a lot of weight when I cut six inches off it, and I will also gain a decent amount of weight when I string it backwards and sinew back it into reflex.
I'm just worried about that splinter...even if glued best I can glue it...it will likely be in the top recurve once I shorten it, and I don't think I want to run the sinew up onto the static recurved section. I could, but I don't want to if I don't have to, as I don't want the extra mass in the tips.
Has anyone ever popped a splinter and then removed that ring? Just curious how much weight I'd lose. 50 good scrapes off the belly would likely drop the poundage ~ 3 to 4 lbs from my experience, and 50 scrapes is a lot less wood than an entire ring. This is what is worrying me about re-backing with the next ring. Am I going to lose too much weight to get it back to mid 50's by shortening it, sinew backing, and recurving.
Thoughts appreciated,