I make bows with a longer top limb too, but rather than tiller a bow to certain measurements at brace height, I ignore that and balance the strength of the drawn limbs relative to my holds on bow and string, and then the brace height tiller is whatever it ends up as... and it can vary from bow to bow. But it doesn't matter what they measure. Balanced is balanced. They're balanced in strength when it matters, when drawn. But if I see an issue or concern and decide to leave the bottom limb just a little stronger than the top, I don't gauge it by brace height measurements. I can easily do it by adjusting limb strength to allow the hook on the string to drift toward the bottom limb a wee bit during the draw. Then I know how much stronger it actually is relative to me, dynamically, when drawn.
Usually when I do this, you wouldn't know it by looking at the braced tiller afterwards because they don't show it at brace the way most folks would expect or want them to. In fact they may still show an even tiller at brace. By making a brace height assumption, many of you would say the bottom limb on such a bow is too weak, when it's actually slightly stronger than the top limb during the draw in my hands. I don't have the problem of the bottom limbs taking more set, and that seems counterintuitive huh. And speaking of counterintuitive, I've wondered if making the bottom limb too strong can cause set in it. The stronger the bottom limb is, the more heel pressure in the bow hand, i.e. the more strain directed into the bottom limb, and less to the top. I don't know, just something I've wondered.