How are you measuring the properties? Few people have access to testing equipment.
The only one that is really critical is the modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus, MOE). That I measure with a bend test, which gets me within ~5% accuracy. The TBB bend test offers good info in the modulus of rupture and set strain, but those are not nearly as critical if you are designing to minimize set and not for the absolute maximum you can squeeze out of the wood.
The 5% accuracy is good enough to design the bow and get a set of dimensions to work to, then I use the measured draw weight at short draw lengths (16-18") to tweak the MOE to get the calculations and measured numbers to match and fine tune the final tiller and draw weight.
My hats off to you guys who get into the intricacies of stress of this and that but my point is 99.5% of us cut a stave, make a bow and shoot it, period. We don't even think about the technical side and still make great bows.
Taking a stave and making it into a bow by eye has worked for 10,000 years. Some of us just like the more complicated way to the same end point.
We don't have to pick one side or another. Someone who is drawn to wooden bows and primitive archery because of science/engineering/interest in the materials and their properties may learn to appreciate the artistic side.
There is definitely room for everybody here (or should be). I appreciate the artistic side, I just have no artistic ability so I have to make it work from the technician side of the equation.
Mark