Here's my take on it... the bits marked "?" might give heartwood for bellies, or the lower "?" might have a skinny thin bow?
The "best bit" has plenty on it to allow for finding the cleanest face, massive warbow
.
The problem with all this is that you have to look at the whole log including knots... so what looks like the best way to cut/split at one end may not agree with the other end, or the position of the knots...
That's why no one who has posted is "wrong" and no one is "right" it's often a compromise!
The pic also shows how splitting wouldn't give you enough control and sawing gives many more options.
You have some nice Yew there
I'd also add that IMO the tight rings on the left compared to the wider rings on the right are not
necessarily anything to do with compression wood. They could be tighter on the left simply because growth on that side was limited by another trunk growing up right next to it. If that had come from a horizontal branch rather than a vertical trunk, I'd say one side was compression.
Just my opinion... who knows exactly how the rings were put down and why?
I've often seen 2,3 or more trunks shooting straight up, all with clean inner faces where they are close and all with branches on the outer faces, ideal stuff for bows.
Del