Hey.
I am by no means an experienced bowyer which is honestly why I'm coming to the pros about this.
In fact the first and only bow I've ever made is a 60 red oak pyramid board bow that's approximately 15#@29".
/)_-
I love me some r/d longbows and I own a 3 pc t/d black hunter but the more I look into the straight stave D bows, the more I'm starting to become a real fan of it's simplicity.
But everytime I look for what makes this design remotely courtable on google, I get a whole load of info that takes a heaping dump all over this design compared to its heat bended counterparts.
The questions I ask are these:
1. How could I make a straight stave pyramid bow design more effective? The only think I can think of, is adding something like a siyah or stiffer outer limb but this probably only severely highlights my inexperience on the subject.
2. I heard from some guy on a video on why he enjoyed straight limbed bows over recurves talk about arrow speed vs arrow cast.
Saying that, as an example, recurves give an initial speed of 200 but drop down over a large distance vs straights which are slower at 180 but maintain that 180 for a lot longer due to simple and direct energy transference.
Not sure if this is a load of bull but it may explain the fabled stability i keep reading about when people compare. Is there any validity to this?
Either way. Many of you have been building bows longer than I've been alive, if anyone could weigh in on this and guide me on how I can fully utilize the strengths that come with a straight limbed classic d bow shape or improve its performance (ideally within the confines of 30-35lbs) I would be EXTREMELY grateful.
I don't care about neckbreaking speed as much as I care about energy efficiency and power.
As they say, speed doesn't matter if you're just missing fast.
Thank you in advance.