Parnell,
yes, I live there. In the city. But for summer I live in rural area. There's not much bow woods. Birch, which is plentiful, GIANT larch trees I would like to turn into 100+ staves
And some other tree I cannot identify, with almost black, scaly bark. Perhaps it's ash. I would look into that. I want the handle to bend only slightly.
So a bendy handle permits the bow to be made shorter than the flatbow of similar draw weight and length? If this is true, I would start making just D bows. My first bow (finished a couple of weeks before), of birch, was a flatbow. I had a hard time tillering 2" limbs (could have made it 1-3/4"). And you have to worry about the fades, the narrow grip, which I have made too short. And for that reason, I want to try a D bow, which I heard are easier to make. I don't want to heat treat as I don't have a vise, a caul, and a heat gun (which are fairly cheap). I imagine it's easy to heat treat with the gear and experience.
So, here's my take: 65" ntn, 1 5/8 limbs, with a straight taper to 1/2 (or a bit less) nocks from midlimb. 45# @ 29". Would that make an efficient, durable bow without heat treating? I'm making this bow for hunting. My stave has a slight crown. I see some "paradox" (if I'm using this word correctly) in this crown thing. I don't want to make the limbs wide because of the crown. But a wider limb makes more wood for energy storage. But then the top of the limb is more strained and the edges don't work much!
I'm sure I will stop asking such questions with experience.
On the picture, the outline is not my just proposed dimensions.