I was referring to the people who offer concrete advice like it is the gospel but with no actual experience, real common here.
I don't mean to be disrespectful, but allow me to disagree nevertheless on the question whether or not everyone without first-hand experience should stay shut.
The greatest advance in human culture was the invention of the script. Suddenly, being able to read meant you could gain information (=second-hand experience) from people you never met, and who may have lived hundreds of years before you. What's more, we live in an era of global communication. We also have access to all that information. All of us have learned to make bows by reading what others wrote, virtually none of us invented any aspect of bow making from scratch. This forum is the proof that second-hand experience is worth an awful lot.
I have never made a bamboo-backed hickory bow. I don't need to make one to know that it can make a great bow. Others have made great BBH, and have explained how, why and have the proof to show it. Others have studied in depth what bow designs are required to make good BBH. I'm merely transferring that information. I don't need the actual first hand experience to transfer this information, without it becoming less reliable. Even if I had made ten of them, that limited experience would be worth less to answer the question "can you make good BBH?" than all the combined experience on thousands of bows made by others, and recorded in writings.
That's the power of the written word.
And if that information came from the Traditional bowyer's
bible, we can consider it "the gospel" on this forum, no?