From Badgers no set tillering thread...............
http://www.primitivearcher.com/smf/index.php/topic,61588.0.htmlI am working on a low elevation yew bow right now
It seems that Steve is reporting good performance of his new bow for heavier arrows, and wonder if materiel selection (in addition to Steve's tillering expertise) could be partly responsible for the results. I am assuming that low elevation also means fast growing/ wide growth rings in this bow. Perhaps he will tell us more about the stave.
I know that a high RPI count s preferred by some, and others find that to be not so necessary, and there is a broad discussion to be engaged in about the merits of various ring counts, where oftentimes the relevance to early/latewood ratios and resulting density are cited.
Looking beyond those qualities that are attributed to higher density, I was curious if some of the preferences for a high vs. low elevation stave, come from different intended purposes for the bow, as often yew is used to fling rather varied range of gpp arrows?