... and if you build a only wood wheely with stone tools this could be considered primitive?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17c5a/17c5a429dffe21dd9de1173a3700ce2697a3ec8c" alt="Grin ;D"
So the variables could be
1) materials of the finished product (bow, string,arrows, quiver..)
2) tools used to make it
3) building techniques, item design (what if you make a flemish string out of rawhide strips?)
4)religion, spiritualism, belief, superstitions? I bet in the past that played a big part in the construction of this weapons. I doubt that a beer, music experience could be classified as truly primitive
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17c5a/17c5a429dffe21dd9de1173a3700ce2697a3ec8c" alt="Grin ;D"
In my point of view "primitive" is often very close to the "replica" concept
We all agree that a replica is not 100% identical to the original
there are always adjustements, compromise and approximations
I'd consider primitive enough (not stating that is correct, just expressing personal opinion) when conditions 1 and 3 are met.
I also like to use self collected materials but this is an obsession of mines
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17c5a/17c5a429dffe21dd9de1173a3700ce2697a3ec8c" alt="Grin ;D"