Author Topic: yew and oceanspray  (Read 2508 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline simson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,310
  • stonehill-primitive-bows
    • stonehill-primitive-bows
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2017, 05:52:11 am »
Nice work on both!
On the short one, I would scrape some more on the inner (mid) portions of both limbs to get more bend. I don't think you are to deep concave, but your stick seems to be quite narrow. hard to say from the pics ...
Simon
Bavaria, Germany

Offline steve b.

  • Member
  • Posts: 999
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2017, 10:56:36 am »
Thanks ya'll for the responses and nice comments.

DC--Not sure.  I buy used women's purses if they have good handle material.

Simpson--You're right.  I was going more for performance than just a nice curve.  When I got to below 1/2" thickness from crown to belly I decided to start shooting it with the idea that I would try another tiller vs. profile either later on this bow or on another if it didn't perform.    Wasn't sure how much the flatness of the belly would contribute to performance.


Offline DC

  • Member
  • Posts: 10,396
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2017, 11:32:35 am »

DC--Not sure.  I buy used women's purses if they have good handle material.


I just couldn't see a seam so I thought it was seamless. Camera angle I guess.

Offline Jon Kaw

  • Member
  • Posts: 44
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2017, 12:53:40 pm »
Beautiful bows, I especially like the bend on the yew.

Offline Weylin

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,296
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2017, 02:36:24 pm »
Nice looking bows, Steve! Good to see you posting again.

Offline steve b.

  • Member
  • Posts: 999
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2017, 10:37:52 pm »
Thanks you Jon.

Hi Weylin.  Good to be back in business.

DC--I see what you mean.



Offline DC

  • Member
  • Posts: 10,396
Re: yew and oceanspray
« Reply #21 on: March 13, 2017, 01:14:11 pm »
Thanks Steve, I was confused.