Author Topic: Wool covered short Recurve.  (Read 4674 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Parnell

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,556
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2016, 12:01:30 pm »
That's crazy.  I'm amazed that profile and bend has held together.  Interesting first bow. :)
1’—>1’

Offline make-n-break

  • Member
  • Posts: 378
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2016, 12:18:06 pm »
Dang. I'm not brave enough to try that combination even if it'd been my 21st bow. Nice work!
"When making a bow from board staves you are freeing a thing of dignity from the humiliation of static servitude." -TBB1

Offline loon

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,307
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2016, 12:18:51 pm »
Yes indeed an impressive bend from a piece of fir..........
Better wood,longer and wider and you'll have a good one next try :) 26 inch draw, stiff handle, sinew backed recurve should be about 58 inch.
Ah come on! Too much man-nee. If that's doable with fir, I'd like to think that a good wood, springy and good at compression, and still sinew, could be more draw weight with the same dimensions, maybe even to 28". But yeah, it probably wouldn't perform as well as a longer one? nor hold much reflex? but short bows are cool

Offline bubby

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,054
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2016, 12:53:08 pm »
Maybe short bows that are properly designed and constructed, by his own accounts it already has 3 in of set and chrysals
failure is an option, everyone fails, it's how you handle it that matters.
The few the proud the 27🏹

Offline PatM

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,737
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2016, 01:31:01 pm »
Agreed. You can really hold a sinewed bow together and have it basically functioning on the sinew more than the belly.

mikekeswick

  • Guest
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2016, 01:48:38 pm »
Yes indeed an impressive bend from a piece of fir..........
Better wood,longer and wider and you'll have a good one next try :) 26 inch draw, stiff handle, sinew backed recurve should be about 58 inch.
Ah come on! Too much man-nee. If that's doable with fir, I'd like to think that a good wood, springy and good at compression, and still sinew, could be more draw weight with the same dimensions, maybe even to 28". But yeah, it probably wouldn't perform as well as a longer one? nor hold much reflex? but short bows are cool

I think you answered your own questions :)

Offline bubby

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,054
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2016, 01:57:21 pm »
Man Pat are we agreeing again😋
failure is an option, everyone fails, it's how you handle it that matters.
The few the proud the 27🏹

Offline simson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,310
  • stonehill-primitive-bows
    • stonehill-primitive-bows
Re: Wool covered short Recurve.
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2016, 02:53:06 pm »
Strange, very strange. Never saw a bow like this one. Dramatical bend on a bow with socks  :o  8)
Simon
Bavaria, Germany