I have noticed a lot of primitive bowyers smooth their arrows out using a variety of methods, such as sandstone abraders, sandpaper, etc. I find this activity slavishly time consuming and frustrating. In fact, I would not even condemn a slave to this tortuous busy work.
Recently I was looking at pictures of a bow that Sitting Bull owned:
I noticed that the arrows don't look smooth and even, like a lot modern arrows do. In fact the bow also lacks this "even" and symmetrical appearance that you see on stuff nowadays. Everything is rough, knobby and uneven.
Also, see this picture of a Khoisan arrow:
It's very snakey and lumpy looking. I have a hard time believing that actual primitive people took the time to laborously smooth a delicate piece of wood. Anyone want to share information? Is smoothness really necessary for increasing the performance of an arrow, or is it just to satisfy an obsessive-compulsive need for aesthetics?
Respectfully,
Jack Napier