True enough, but I didn't throw down a guarantee. You did. I was just hoping you would back up your argument with something. Scientific or not. Here....
#1 about 4 rings per inch.
#2 about 15 rings per inch.
I made bows from both, and I like them both. Love them both. But they are different bows. The thinner ringed bow having lower mass, took less set and shoots at a higher draw weight than the thick ringed bow.
I have not run either thru a chrono, but I know what I like. Low set, low mass, hunting weight bows. 3 things that are sometimes difficult for me to achieve together. The thinner ringed stuff has done that for me more often than the thick.