I've come to this conclusion after more or less getting the last 3 or 4 bows I've built bending a bit too much in the handle and searching through old posts and seeing many members who have done the same. These bows have the handle as the widest part and taper to the nocks. Simple design...
in theory. I'm finding that the amount of wood to get the handle flexing at full draw is very precise, and it is very easy to end up with the handle being stiff or bending too much. The result is too much set in the inner limbs with hand shock or having a 1 3/8 inch wide handle that does nothing for you other than require more specifically spined arrows.
First bow I posted a few weeks ago was the first one I'd made in a long time. It was about 43# or so and bent too much in the handle which jarred my hand slightly when I shot.
Second bow is a longbow 71" tip to tip pulling 52#. My desire to have it bending in the handle and inner limbs for a full compass tiller resulted in too much set near the handle with less than ideal cast after 100 arrows or so shot. A stiff handle with an elliptical-like tiller would have been easier to build and would have performed better.
I typically tiller the limbs then work back towards the handle. This is very time consuming trying to figure out how much wood to remove exactly at the handle before it begins to flex slightly without it bending far too much, taking set at the handle. Lastly, I have difficulty balancing the two limbs with one another as the handle begins to factor into the tiller which easily results in one limb being weaker than the other. I d say now for myself I'm foregoing the bendy handled bow to go for a stiff handled bow and would advise beginners to do the same. I appreciate their design and use, but I find them annoyingly difficult to tiller sometimes.
Just my thoughts on that....