please understand that my asking that question was playing a bit of the devils advocate, and If some of my points of view seem contrary, I wish it to be known that I am questioning what seems (to me anyways) to be questionable ideas, and most assuredly not directed personally and any of the esteemed forumites voicing their opposing views.
That said, some of the ideas I have heard presented, justifying the hunt, are what I would call the "redneck knee jerk" retorts to the "bleeding hearts" emo bs. By that I mean, a little more thoughtfulness about the complexities of co-existing with our fellow species would be useful.
Sorry Urufu, but this subject is a can of worms whether we like it or not.
Jo jo. I am not to convinced. I am not a wayward yearling bear, but I could imagine that getting flattened by a dodge would be just as stressful as being gobbled by a gator. The points of the arguments that keeps me wondering is,..
If we often find the antis views a bit hard to swallow because of their propensity to worship critters and trees and such, are we not just as radical when we say "we neeed to kill you for your own good"
willie
btw, do bears eat wild pigs and those nasty dillas in florida?
DC- you posted while I was composing, but I gotta ask, do you really think that that bears will be here after we are gone?