According to Forest Products Laboratory data hard maple, red oak, and white ash have nearly identical tensile elastic modulus at around 12,000 MPa. Pignut Hickory has a tensile elastic modulus of 15,600MPa.
My point is that all the non hickory options mentioned should perform identically in terms of how likely they are to promote compression failure in the belly, which should be entirely dependent on tensile modulus. Which backing is strongest (i.e. Which can stretch farter before breaking) is another matter, but FWIW, maple, ash, and red oak, also have similar modulus of rupture (stress at failure), and strain at failure. So according to the data, they should be nearly identical, and straight grain probably matters a lot more than species.
If the hickory backing is trapped to 80% of limb width it should perform identically to unwrapped maple, ash, or oak.
Lastly, according to the data, an even better choice would be Elm for a backing as Elm is about 20% less tensile modulus than maple, ash, or oak, and nearly 35% less than hickory.
Sorry for the rant, it's the Engineer's plight .... We can only understand the world numerically .... Lastly this assumes the data is accurate, but since I have no reason to doubt the validity, I use it.
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/ch04.pdf