I was just thinking about some of the very early bows found in the archaeological record. Now, we all know that the best cross section for bow limbs is flat, wide, and somewhat rectangular. But, when you look at some of the most famous old bows from almost any continent, you see allot of bows with rounded cross sections and very narrow profiles. From the yew stave found with Otzi the iceman, to the heavyweight bows made by the Hadza, to the Spiro mounds bow made of osage found just north of where i live, and even the heavy welsh longbows made of elm. All of them are narrow and have a near perfectly round cross section. And obviously no distinguishable handle section. I'm just wondering why it is that after having thousands of years to develop their archery equipment, why would they stick with that design? Please post any thoughts.
.