Author Topic: Nomenclature  (Read 4715 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Traxx

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,018
Re: Nomenclature
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2015, 09:29:31 pm »
When i use the term R/D,im talking about the double curve bow,Reflexed at the riser and deflexed mid limb.The type used from Canada to mexico,by Native people.Musta been somethin to em for so many to use em. ;)

Offline PatM

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,737
Re: Nomenclature
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2015, 09:38:36 pm »
That's what I mean about using another specialised term for those styles that probably predates modern abbreviations. "Double curve" or "gullwing" seems to work better for that and most people instantly know exactly what you mean by that with no confusing it with a modern hybrid longbow.
 I wonder what the Natives called them... probably "bows" lol

Offline dylanholderman

  • Member
  • Posts: 787
Re: Nomenclature
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2015, 09:56:19 pm »
I've always wondered if the "gullwing" bows people talk about aren't just a bow with a reflexed handle that has taken a lot of set from being left strung  ???

Offline Traxx

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,018
Re: Nomenclature
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2015, 12:06:58 am »
dylanholderman,

Thats been a subject that has been debated many times as well. :laugh:

Offline Dances with squirrels

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,222
Re: Nomenclature
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2015, 06:51:53 am »
I use deflex/reflex. When folks call the same bow reflex/deflex I feel they're incorrect, but know what they're talking about so don't bother correcting them.
Straight wood may make a better bow, but crooked wood makes a better bowyer