Somehow I fail to see any deliberate attempt at fraud or deceit. I've got a feeling this one wouldn't get very far in court. My circle of associates includes replicators, scholars, writers, artists, and historians. It is also, as on this board, made up of people of various cultures from around the globe. This group includes Europeans, Asians, Australians, New Zealanders and North Americans. I see misrepresentation of artifacts that go on the auction block all the time. Put a little patina on it, and it's ready to be sold as an original. Most of the time, it is not the maker that is misrepresenting the item. It is usually someone that purchased it as a replica, then sold it, and then it appears as an original. I completely agree that this is an unscrupulous way to transact business, and it is a deliberate attempt to deceive someone. This should be prosecuted fully. I also know a number of Indian, or if you prefer Native, craftsmen and women that depend on their craft for a living. There are several of you on this site who know me, and you also know some of the people in the Indian community that I am referring to. This then leads to the argument over blood quantum, adoption, and marriage into an Indian family. I know people that fall into every conceivable category of this discussion, and this could be argued for years (actually it has been and still is). What it all boils down to is intentional deceit. That was not done in this case.
Curtis