Hi guys,
I'm working on my first bow at the moment, an elm stave. It was cut about 12 years ago, with the bark left on, unsplit. I split it 6 months ago and yesterday I started removing the bark. The bark was still very firmly attached, aside from a small section at one end which peeled off leaving a thin layer of cambium behind.
I've been using a very sharp chisel for the job, just gently with my hands, no hammers or anything. It's working pretty well as I am able to use very little force to make shavings, and can get a lot of control out of it, but I wondered about violating the back of the stave.
I take the bark off, then I hit the cambium layer, which seems to be pretty thick, then I get down to the sapwood. It seems very difficult to take the cambium off without taking off ANY sapwood at all. In places I have gone a little deeper than I would like, but it's VERY minor, maybe 1/16th of an inch as most (I'm being VERY careful.)
When people talk about violating the back, are we talking about going though growth rings, or are we talking about the wood fibres themselves?
If we're talking growth rings, then I'm fine, the rings are quite thick and I'm nowhere remotely near going through a growth ring, but if we're talking cutting through fibres, I've probably cut through some in a couple of places.
How forgiving is a whitewood like elm in this situation with very small wood fibre violations like this? Am I better off trying to go down to the next ring? Like I said the nicks are very very small.
I'm not too worried about "wasting" the wood, more interested in learning what it's got to teach me.
Ben