Author Topic: Deflex-reflex versus deflex-recurve  (Read 19781 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: Deflex-reflex versus deflex-recurve
« Reply #30 on: March 05, 2014, 03:14:22 pm »
See... I knew I'd miss one.  >:(

Online Pappy

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31,913
  • if you have to ask you wouldn't understand ,Tenn.
Re: Deflex-reflex versus deflex-recurve
« Reply #31 on: March 06, 2014, 08:14:46 am »
I think pretty much what adb said,I know in the tournament world if the string touches the limb anywhere other than the nocks it is considered a recurve.  ;)
 Pappy
Clarksville,Tennessee
TwinOaks Bowhunters
Life is Good

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,119
Re: Deflex-reflex versus deflex-recurve
« Reply #32 on: March 06, 2014, 08:51:06 am »
  Yep Pappy, thats all there is to it. If is just barely touching it is considered a recurve.

Offline wapiti1997

  • Member
  • Posts: 414
    • Joe Lacefield Wildlife and Nature Photography
Re: Deflex-reflex versus deflex-recurve
« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2014, 10:19:01 am »
I consider anything over 56" a  long bow....  >:D

I have always been told at shoots that as others have stated, the string touching the limb other than the nocks of a braced bow = recurve.