Author Topic: Hickory versus Maple Backing  (Read 10024 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline BrokenArrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 168
Hickory versus Maple Backing
« on: February 07, 2014, 03:33:45 pm »
I have made a number of bows with hickory backings and none have broken. I have made 2 bows with hard maple backing and they both broke! Tell me your experiences with backing? Other than hickory what else has been tried other than bamboo?
Thanks

Offline Easternarcher

  • Member
  • Posts: 622
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2014, 03:49:07 pm »
wait for ADB and he'll give you his take on maple....
I have backings in maple -ash and hickory besides boo.
HAven't tried the maple or ash yet.

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2014, 04:20:43 pm »
Just the opposite for me.  Several Hickory failures and none with Maple.  Elm works well along with White Ash but I have had failures with both.  I've even used HHB for backings before, worked well
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com

Offline bubby

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,054
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2014, 05:50:39 pm »
maple for me, I've had many more hickory fails than maple, also like white oak and birch
failure is an option, everyone fails, it's how you handle it that matters.
The few the proud the 27🏹

Offline bow101

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,235
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2014, 05:54:21 pm »
What are you guys paying for lumber yard wood in the US.  Here is Canada I pay $1.60 a foot for 1X2 maple.  $2.00 a foot for 1X3,  eastern hard maple.  Can't remember what red oak is.
"The privilege of a lifetime is being who you are."  Joseph Campbell

Offline BOWMAN53

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,238
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2014, 06:10:43 pm »
me and bubby are only three hour apart and we pay totally different prices. maple is super cheap for him but super expensive for me.

Offline DarkSoul

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,315
    • Orion Bows
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2014, 06:54:06 pm »
Both maple and hickory (and many more woods, for that matter) will make excellent backings. But you need to match the backing to the belly wood and design that you choose.
Quote from Traditional Bowyers Bible vol. 2, page 41:
Quote
Backings should have equal or lower stretch resistance than bellies have compression resistance.
Strong woods can have high stretch-resistant backs.
Weaker woods will take less set if backed with less stretch-resistant material.
Lighter woods will suffer unnecessary set if backed with hickory, bamboo or linen, and will sugger again due to hickory's high mass. If light-woods are backed with hickory, the backing should be much thinner than usual.

If you're asking: "does hickory make a stronger backing than maple?" then the answer is 'YES!" It simply has a higher tensile strength. But, the belly wood that you apply the backing to, needs to be strong enough to be able to resist this high tensile strength. If you need a backing for a borderline bow wood such as, say, beech or cherry, then hickory will be completely inadequate. Maple will be a much better choice. It's not as simple as just selecting the strongest wood for backings.
"Sonuit contento nervus ab arcu."
Ovid, Metamorphoses VI-286

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2014, 07:00:14 pm »
wait for ADB and he'll give you his take on maple....
I have backings in maple -ash and hickory besides boo.
HAven't tried the maple or ash yet.

Yup, hard maple is great backing wood IMO. Can't recall any failures with it. I've used it with yew to make warbows up to 120#. I also made a 74# maple backed ipe flatbow. Also used it with almost every compression strong belly wood there is, including: ipe, osage, yew, cherry, jatoba, yellowheart, blah, blah, blah. ELBs, flatbows, shortbows, longbows. You get the idea... I like it. All about the grain, of course.

That being said, I also like hickory and ash for backing wood. If done properly, any of these woods will work fine.

Offline toomanyknots

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,132
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2014, 07:07:20 pm »
I feel the same as Adb about hard maple. I have been using the same chuck I bought for 30 bucks for close to a year now I think, so I haven't ever used nothing but the same chunk I got right now, but it has been great for me. They seem to take less set than hickory too. I do like the assurance of hickory when making a really heavy warbow though. It seems the maple I got is a better choice a lot of the time though, takes less set that the bows I back with hickory, and is lighter too.
"The way of heaven is like the bending of a bow-
 the upper part is pressed down,
 the lower part is raised up,
 the part that has too much is reduced,
 the part that has too little is increased."

- Tao Te Ching, 77, A new translation by Victor H. Mair

Offline vinemaplebows

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,419
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2014, 10:19:43 pm »
You should very thickness for the belly wood used. I generally use between 3/16 to 1/8. Thinner for weaker compression prone woods. Can't wait to get a drum sander!


VMB
Debating is an intellectual exchange of differing views...with no winners.

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2014, 10:29:29 pm »
You should very thickness for the belly wood used. I generally use between 3/16 to 1/8. Thinner for weaker compression prone woods. Can't wait to get a drum sander!


VMB

I'm not following you.   ???

Offline lostarrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,348
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2014, 11:22:57 pm »
What are you guys paying for lumber yard wood in the US.  Here is Canada I pay $1.60 a foot for 1X2 maple.  $2.00 a foot for 1X3,  eastern hard maple.  Can't remember what red oak is.

 You're buying it in the wrong place >:D Oak@ $2- $3 /bd ft.  (that's 1"x12"x12") Maple  @ $3/ bd.ft. I never buy it from big box.

Offline willie

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,228
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2014, 12:51:44 am »
vmb
Quote
Thinner for weaker compression prone woods.
what is the thinnest you have succesfully gone over the working limbs for a weaker wood belly?
are you thinning the back after glue-up?
thanks
willie

Offline DarkSoul

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,315
    • Orion Bows
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2014, 07:55:55 am »
A 'board foot' of maple would cost the equivalent of about 17 USD on this side of the pond... (except we use euros and the metrical system). Now you know why I don't regularly buy hard maple, red/white oak or any other American hardwood.

@ willie:
The traditional bowyer's bible recommends about 10% of the total limb thickness to constiture the backing, when the backing wood is much stronger than the belly wood. That means about 1-16" (or thick veneer). This backing is so flexible, that I can imagine it's best to glue down a 1/8" backing first, and thin it down after the glue has set.
"Sonuit contento nervus ab arcu."
Ovid, Metamorphoses VI-286

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Hickory versus Maple Backing
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2014, 08:28:46 am »
You should vary thickness for the belly wood used. I generally use between 3/16 to 1/8. Thinner for weaker compression prone woods. Can't wait to get a drum sander!


VMB

I vary the thickness according to the draw weight I am going for and not the compression strength of the wood.
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com