I have to admit total ignorance here - I thought positive tiller was used in order to make both limbs appear equal at full draw despite the bow not actually being held and shot dead center... Is that wrong? Surely the goal isn't to have the bottom limb appear stronger at full draw is it?
With only 1/4" positive tiller seeming to be the norm, is that enough to cause the top limb to fail completely?
Edit: Didn't mean to call you elitist - that came out wrong. I just felt the comment about only newbies using boards seemed a bit out of order. I actually think staves are easier to work, as I can imagine it's bloody awkward tillering a long flat plank.
I find board bows much easier and quicker to build. Almost cookie cutter. The tiller is exceptionally easy to judge when you look at a straight line . The layout is all done with a straight edge. Waste removal is done with a bandsaw in a mater of minutes , and after a bit of cleanup to the sawcuts, your bow is nearly tillered if your design was good in the first place. It almost makes you feel a little dirty
like you're cheating somehow
As for this thread , I'm on both sides of the argument here I guess. Wood from right at the stump is far more dense than even 2' up . After you get past the buttresses it all evens out (or not. It's a tree. It's organic ,and it follows it's own genetic code for survival, and is primarily influenced by it's environment) . It builds up extra cells around spots that need reinforcing , like a branch or knot. Wider rings don't always mean weaker wood.
Having said that ,I would think the reason for any breakage( other than damage or abuse) , would be an overlooked design/tillering flaw . It may not present itself in the first 300 shots, but a change in humidity , shooting style , etc. could be the start of one tiny little change ,which will eventually spiral exponentially to become a failure. Not always that it was tillered poorly , because it may have been tillered perfectly for the characteristics of the wood at the time. But I think all would agree , the piece of wood is not the same as it was when you cut the tree, or when you dried it ,or when you roughed it out , or when you made a bow.
My suspicion would be that most in Dell's shooting circle of friends would be shooting longbows(?) traditionally made with a positive tiller(?) Common thinking and tradition dictates putting the stronger limb on the bottom. Maybe it's time to revisit this "Theory ". I know I've decreased to 1/16 - 1/8" max, and am still not entirely convinced of the merits, so I'm going with Marc and PD on the fact that it should be balanced first and foremost.