Author Topic: Why no oak warbows?  (Read 11384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thesquirrelslinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,245
Why no oak warbows?
« on: December 26, 2013, 05:12:42 pm »
I have heard of PLENTY of people making warbows from almost every wood except the oaks.
Of old, i am sure someone tried it.
How does it hold up under 130# draw weight?
Also maple?
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2013, 03:47:11 am »
Maple makes a fine backing for a warbow, especially with yew. However, you don't see warbows made from oak or maple, because they're not ideal wood. The whitewoods excel at being flat and wide, not narrow and round.

Offline Del the cat

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,322
    • Derek Hutchison Native Wood Self Bows
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2013, 04:32:20 am »
'Cos it would weigh a ton and chrysal like screwed up ball of paper.... (IMO)
Del
Health warning, these posts may contain traces of nut.

Offline AH

  • Member
  • Posts: 244
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2013, 12:47:17 pm »

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2013, 01:43:18 pm »
  Red oak will make a war bow at a reasonable mass weight. The tiller needs to be a full arc of the circle and the belly flatter than you might get away with yew. A few years back I made 7 bows between 270# and 300# out of red oak. They were used on a giant wheel like a crossbows, they were designed to draw 24" and they set it up to draw 30" so they took a lot of set but red oak is a decent bow wood.

Offline toomanyknots

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,132
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2013, 02:44:39 pm »
  Red oak will make a war bow at a reasonable mass weight. The tiller needs to be a full arc of the circle and the belly flatter than you might get away with yew. A few years back I made 7 bows between 270# and 300# out of red oak. They were used on a giant wheel like a crossbows, they were designed to draw 24" and they set it up to draw 30" so they took a lot of set but red oak is a decent bow wood.

That just sounds like all kinds of fun. I bet you set some world records with those bows. Sounds like a ("exploitative") to tiller,  ;D.

check this out
http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/topic/26702#.Ur2s2PRDvL8

I've had similar results to this guys bow using other woods close to red oak in compression, like a couple pieces of crappy yellow heart (I know yellow heart can be good, but I had some crappier pieces which would chrysal a lot). I think the key is that:

- The bow is long, distributing stress more evenly than the typical red oak flat bow
- The bow was glued up in reflex with a resilient backing

I think the backing, when using a resilient backing that is good at recovering and holding reflex, is used in a longbow design, when glued into reflex, the belly wood will appear to be under less stress or appear to take compression better. But I don't know if it appears that way only, or actually is less stressed? For example, I had a trilam bow that had 2" reflex or so. It might of been maple backing, PH core, and hickory belly, or it might of had a bamboo backing, can't remember for sure. But something was wrong with the bow, and I delaminated the it. When I did so, the belly promptly took a bunch of set, where the entire bow had held reflex beforehand! The backing and core didn't wanna delaminate from each other, and so they both held the glued in reflex still. This is just one example, but I have had this experience a bunch of times. I have a boo/something/jatoba bow still (or a piece of it anyway) that held 2 or 3 inches reflex, where the belly had chrysaled to no return. Same thing with a couple trilams with boo backing and yellow heart bellys too. My whole point is not just about perry reflex hiding or compensating, at least in the unbraced appearance (set/reflex) for the compressed belly cells, but also the fact that a backing, or maybe even the back of a selfbow, can have a big effect on whether a bow takes set or not. Makes you think, when you consider how yew is known for it's sapwood, and osage and locust are known for removing it, etc.
"The way of heaven is like the bending of a bow-
 the upper part is pressed down,
 the lower part is raised up,
 the part that has too much is reduced,
 the part that has too little is increased."

- Tao Te Ching, 77, A new translation by Victor H. Mair

Offline Del the cat

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,322
    • Derek Hutchison Native Wood Self Bows
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2013, 04:27:52 pm »
I don't think our UK Oak is the same as your US red Oak....
Our stuff is best for building battleships, which then sink in the Solent ::)
Del
Health warning, these posts may contain traces of nut.

Offline toomanyknots

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,132
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2013, 05:01:31 pm »
I don't think our UK Oak is the same as your US red Oak....
Our stuff is best for building battleships, which then sink in the Solent ::)
Del

 ;D
"The way of heaven is like the bending of a bow-
 the upper part is pressed down,
 the lower part is raised up,
 the part that has too much is reduced,
 the part that has too little is increased."

- Tao Te Ching, 77, A new translation by Victor H. Mair

Offline Yeomanbowman

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
    • warbowwales
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2013, 07:21:53 am »
Alanesque made a laminated ash/oak 160lb bow a few years back and it shot for a good while despite fretting on the belly.  I remember it taking a fair amount of set and being a little slow for the wait.  I think he has details on his backstreet bowyer site.

Offline JW_Halverson

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,928
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2014, 12:09:18 am »
I don't think our UK Oak is the same as your US red Oak....
Our stuff is best for building battleships, which then sink in the Solent ::)
Del

"Heart of Oak are our ships,
Jolly Tars are our men,
We always are ready: Steady, boys, Steady!
We'll fight and we'll conquer again and again."


I'd ship with Lucky Jack Aubrey, his "lesser of two weevils" comment notwithstanding. 
Guns have triggers. Bicycles have wheels. Trees and bows have wooden limbs.

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2014, 01:24:10 am »
  Knotts, I didn't have any time to tiller the bows, I just sawed them out and sanded them. I think I had about 1 1/2 days to build all 7, they ended up taking about 5" of set or more and shot like dogs. They were for a TV show.

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2014, 10:52:31 am »
I would think White Oak would be a much better candidate for a warbow and it seems to me I have seen the odd warbow made out of some
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com

Offline adb

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,339
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #12 on: January 01, 2014, 11:04:47 am »
White oak certainly makes a good backing. On par with hickory IMHO.

Offline occupant

  • Member
  • Posts: 52
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2014, 10:09:57 am »
I have made several lighter weight bows from white oak, ranging from 35# to 56#. They shot fine, bent nicely, but lost one at half draw. I suspect it due to sitting on a rack for some months in the very low humidity of winter.

Offline kevinsmith5

  • Member
  • Posts: 287
Re: Why no oak warbows?
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2014, 10:44:34 pm »
I've used white oak as a backing on warbows but never tried an all white oak one. White oak over ipe is a great combo.