What TimBo said.
sinew is really good for only one thing from an efficiency standpoint--keeping short bows alive.
I have a few miles of Jute that I am going to try as backing asap.
(Fair warning, the following is just my opinion and is not meant to be taken too awful seriously or personally in any way,
)
With all due respect, sinew is resilient more so than rubber, making it recover it's original condition after being stretched in tension much much more than any other backing. This absolutely adds to performance when used effectively, typically by reflexing the unstrung bow, adding significantly to the early draw weight (while smoothing out the force draw curve), and in effect transferring more energy to the arrow than a bow with less early draw weight / a more uphill force draw curve. And although other materials can of course be used to the same effect via perry reflexing in a laminate, sinew is the only backing material (although I think wood backings will to a degree) that will actually pull itself back into reflex, lessening the responsibility of the belly to regain the originial unstrung profile. To say that the added weight of sinew brings any sinewed bow to a disadvantage off rip is ignoring 1000s of years of bowyers effectively and efficiently using sinew both for hunting and war, from one continent to next, from hemisphere to the other.