Author Topic: Ambush Bow Challenge  (Read 10596 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Keenan

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,824
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #30 on: December 02, 2012, 12:41:13 pm »
 ;Simson, I agree with your thoughts except for one. Yew will do better! ;D >:D Harder wood doesn't always mean stronger. ;)

blackhawk

  • Guest
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #31 on: December 02, 2012, 12:42:44 pm »
My thoughts:
max 58",
a static recurve for speed,
a deflex just after the handle so the tips are laying only 1" befor the handle - this allows heavy early drawweight and to keep the bow strung for the whole day,
and I prefer heavier drawweights - min 65#
wood: no softwood like yew or others, best choice Imo is osage

simson


You mean something like this simson >:D....this osage stave was 56"ttt before shaping and is rawhide backed...its just waiting for me to finish tiller it out..intended specs are at least 60@28"

 

blackhawk

  • Guest
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #32 on: December 02, 2012, 12:45:18 pm »
;Simson, I agree with your thoughts except for one. Yew will do better! ;D >:D Harder wood doesn't always mean stronger. ;)

Not everyone can carry a bow with "class" thru the woods like you Keenan ;)  :laugh:

Offline fishfinder401

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,485
  • noel laflamme noellaf2@cox.net
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #33 on: December 02, 2012, 03:43:22 pm »
since i cant do anything normal, i think im going to have to try making a warbow weight ambush bow that sticks to all of the requirements and draws 31in >:D >:D >:D >:D
(i have a feeling this will either be a very good or absolutely terrible idea)
warbows and fishing, what else is there to do?
modern technology only takes you so far, remove electricity and then what

Offline RyanY

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,999
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #34 on: December 02, 2012, 06:19:56 pm »
fishfinder401, I'm guessing that means a minimum of 80#?  :laugh:

Well since this discussing is wandering back and forth I'm going to put my foot down and decide on the rules. The bow should meet the requirements specified by Dean's initial writing.

Changes:
1. The bow should be at least 40# at your draw length but if so then the bow should be reduced two inches for every 5# of draw weight. This means a 40# bow will be 54" and a 45# bow will be 56". No minimum length but a max length of 58". Minimum draw weight of 40# but no max draw weight.

2. The difference in draw length below 28" should be subtracted from the bow length. If the bow is meant to be 50#@26" then it should be 56" long max.

The two rules above combine. For example, a 40#@26" bow should be 52" long.

I think these are fair rules that will challenge the builder no matter what their desired draw weight and length.

Offline fishfinder401

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,485
  • noel laflamme noellaf2@cox.net
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #35 on: December 02, 2012, 06:23:07 pm »
80  ::) im thinking more like 130 >:D
i want to be able to ambush a armored knight lol
warbows and fishing, what else is there to do?
modern technology only takes you so far, remove electricity and then what

Offline KShip85

  • Member
  • Posts: 365
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #36 on: December 02, 2012, 09:24:23 pm »
Are we talking self bows only or can it be backed?

Kip
Kip Shipley    Bloomington, IN

Offline fishfinder401

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,485
  • noel laflamme noellaf2@cox.net
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #37 on: December 02, 2012, 09:28:32 pm »
Are we talking self bows only or can it be backed?

Kip
good point
warbows and fishing, what else is there to do?
modern technology only takes you so far, remove electricity and then what

Offline RyanY

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,999
Re: Ambush Bow Challenge
« Reply #38 on: December 02, 2012, 10:22:10 pm »
KShip85, I think both are fine but they should be compared relative to the same style.