Yea Slim, the 'horns fans are pretty sad today. Both my son-in-laws went to college in OK and I expect to hear from both today.
I'm really pretty neutral, having lived all over the midwest before here, but I might favor Nebraska's Huskers a little.
Well that's cool, your experience with wood all over Texas is very enlightening. While I've made bows out of osage from many states, in every case the wood came from the area around where we, or relatives lived. I have no experience with wood all around a state like you have. I would never have guessed that your thick ringed wood came from a dry place like the hill country. I've learned something, as that isn't my experience in Texas. I agree that thick ringed osage is a little less dense than thin, and both make great bows.
And that was the point of my original post. There are several benefits to a forum like this one, one of the biggies being the diversity of our shared experiences. I posted originally because my personal experience does not agree that thin ringed osage is prone to raising a splinter when unbacked. Like others, including yourself, thin ringed osage has made great unbacked bows for me. I agree with sleek that it might not be best for new bowyers and maybe that was the point to his post and I missed it. You're right, the definition of thin is gonna vary between bowyers and regions.
I'm certainly not in the league of most of the bowyers here. For example, I have never made a whitewood stave bow and only 1 board bow which was maple. I'm an osage guy through and through and only on osage bows do I feel I have enough experience to comment. Even there I have learned a great deal from people on the forum...even today.
It's a great place.
George