Author Topic: wood ID please!  (Read 1359 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blades7558

  • Member
  • Posts: 114
wood ID please!
« on: October 08, 2012, 09:39:29 pm »
A friend dropped these and a few eastern red cedars off for free with only a promise to make him a bow, he thought it was an osage because of the yellow but I'm pretty sure it is a locust. I'm just not 100% on which type of locust it is. It has kind of loose growth rings and white sap wood.

If it is locust, what part of the tree should I use? just heart wood or doesn't it matter?

THANKS!
build em...break em...sigh....build em....

Offline paulsemp

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,918
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2012, 09:46:52 pm »
looks like mulberry to me

Offline missilemaster

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,172
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2012, 10:05:18 pm »
Mullberry
All men die,  few men ever really live.

Real men love Jesus.

blackhawk

  • Guest
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2012, 10:40:53 pm »
Yup,and its best to chase a heartwood ring for the back of the bow,but first you got some splitting and seasoning to do

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,609
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2012, 12:18:05 am »
With those thick rings and the bark I'd say mulberry also. You can build a bow with any of the wood but the heartwood is best. It will compete with osage but will be 10% bigger than the same weight osage bow. It is physically lighter so that almost evens them out.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline cornus

  • Member
  • Posts: 27
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2012, 08:17:09 am »
Beautiful heartwood color. Yellow wood is good bowwood :)

Offline Parnell

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,556
Re: wood ID please!
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2012, 10:23:21 am »
I'm surprised we don't see more mulberry wood being used.  I just planted a tree the other day, now i just got to give it twenty years, I suppose!
1’—>1’