LOL!!!!!
I couldnt disagree more.I find it amuseing, that this notion,of 40 lb hunting bows,being ineficient for the job on deer size critters,seems to be touted by people,in recent years,yet folks did it quite often,prior to the invention of the internet.In fact,there are a few of the "Icons" of the sport,who would dissagree as well,such as Howard Hill,Ron Laclair and Tim Meigs.It also seems to me,that most often,those that proclaim,40 lb bows as ineficient for the job,are those that most likely,have really never used them for the purpose.If someone,wants to use heavier and can REALLY handle more,thats great,more power to ya,but to say that less is ineficient and even unethical,is foolish,when there is plenty evidence to the contrary.I guess if a person,is recklessly out there flingin arrows,then you might have an argument,but i contend,that in that case,that it doesnt really matter what poundage a person uses,would it?The ONLY insurance in bowhunting,is well placed sharp broadheads,from an archer,who has self controll and the maturity to know when to drop the string and when to let em walk.PERIOD.
My question to some of the posts,
This under 15 yrd shots from 40 lb bows.Is that a personal limitation,you put on yourself,or a declaration,of the inability of the equiptment,beyond that distance?