I don't think weight would be a consistent measurement of spine. There is just too much variation among wood from even the same species. The spine is definitely related to weight, but there are just too many other factors for weight to be a singular measure of it. I mean you have weight, diameter, orientation of grain, quality of wood, wood species, etc.
If you combined two or three of those factors together you could probably come up with a good model, but it would be awful hard to quantify the orientation of the grain or the quality of the wood.