Thanks Marc for chiming in! Thanks Pearl for hangin with me on this one. I did a little work this morning and she feels good in the hand whichever limb is the bottom. Put a couple of arrows through both ways and can't tell a significant difference. Looked in the mirror also as i drew to 17". Here's what i see:
*the higher i brace it, the more balanced the tiller looks at brace and draw
*the non-recurved limb is thicker, but the rings i notice are thinner (4 rings per 1/4" vs the other end at 3 per 1/4")
*in all cases, it is evident that the thinner recurved limb is bending much more than the other, so it seems the non-recurved is actually the stiffer limb (which leads me to think adding any reflex to the tip would make things worse)
Should the recurved limb need to be thinner since it actually has to bend much more than the other from unbraced to drawn profile? Seems right in my mind, but y'all know better.
If that is not the case, I'm thinking that it'd be ok to remove some material from the other limb, which previously made the string slope MORE at low brace, but it will even up at full brace?
I'm not going to draw any further than the current 17" until i get the rawhide on, so i won't be able to check some of these thoughts until then (not removing any wood until i can verify that it needs it).
Hope I'm not being too big of a pain in the butt on this, appreciate so much y'alls help!!!