Once you are cited Pat, You are right, the judge is where to take your complaint. Arguing with the officer is a moot point once you've been served. But there can be some reasoning done with an officer. They have discretion and most are willing to utilize it. In this case there is no citing being done, and therefore no judge to bitch too.
In this case I have mixed feelings. Unless there is actually law/ordinance on the books the officers need to lay off, and maybe explain that to the neighbor. But my background also makes me look at this from the eyes of the officer. My wife is a 911 operator and I was an officer. I can see it now, the dispatcher gets a call that some kid is playing with a weapon and shooting up the neighborhood, exageratted of course but that's what they do. The officer shows up and the kid is a little feisty right off the bat, being the officer you don't know what's going on except what you've been told, so when you show up and the person is defensive and maybe a bit hostile it's likely the officer would be a bit...forward.
Aznboi, it's time for you to be educated. Find out what the laws are. Unfortunately laws like reckless endangerment are written pretty loosely and can be articulated to be darn near anything. But find out specific to the use of bows and arrows. If there is nothing on the books then when they show up again respectfully explain to the officer that you are doing nothing illegal and unless he is going to cite you, you are going to continue engaging in a legal activity. Then if he cites you, you can bitch to the judge
Also I would start assesing your shooting lane and back stops etc so if a case of endangerment is attempted you have evidence to the contrary.