Pat - I'm in total agreement with you regarding the "extra" material not adding anything to the overall package. I should have used a 2x4" rather than a 2x6" and would have had a better result. My primary objective was to get a true static and basically satisfy my desire to see if I could actually make the wood take that degree of bend, which it obviously has. I just finished my first HHB recurve which has much less radius in the tips, and it's a performer for sure. I could have reduced the tip mass another 30% and even gotten more out of it, as well as inducing reflex before tillering, but I wanted a durable and dependable weapon. For this one, I'm hoping to get a more narrow limbed 50's style with true statics. Am I hot on Marc St. Lewis' speed demon concepts
Hardly. He is a master bowyer, and I'm just a guy that likes to keep busy and love casting arrows with a bow that came from a living tree that I harvested. Just as I like to catch a trout on a rod I built with a fly of my own design. If I can finish this out and it will put arrows on the mark, I'll be satisfied. I have no ego to feed nor am I vying for any "best bow" accolades. I just thought some might enjoy seeing something different.
It's 65" tip to tip currently and 1-3/4" wide.