After seeing the Hupa bows in last month's PA I've decided to make one about 40" long (short?
)
Getting along o/k then I saw a guy on Utube from 1961 making one.
His was very thin, looked to be about 5/16 which is thinner than I thought. He says that the wood is only a former to hold the sinew back?
The bow is then pulled backwards (deflex?) so it looks like a drawn bow, but backwards. The sinew is then glue on what looks like in this position the inner curve (belly). He chewed sturgeons air bladder then spat it into a cup and that was the glue. I don't think I'll be doing that! Hide glue for me.
The inner curve was fully covered in sinew then left to dry. The bow is then strung the other way so that the sinew backing was under great tension.
My question, I thought that if you did that the sinew would be too far stretched and would 'whiten' when fully drawn causing it to weaken.
Has anybody applied sinew like that on a bow with that much deflex/reflex forced into it(I can't work out which it is)? With string off the bow is not flat but looks like severe string follow, the opposite way though! I hope that makes sense.
I know the mongolian horn/sinew bows look like that unstrung.