DING DING DING!!!! We have a winner...actually, "Winners!" Half-eye and Gordon both have identified what, upon close inspection, appears to be a counterflex break. What is tough to see from the photographs are the multiple smaller fibers that are exploding outward from the two major pieces as if the wood broke under tension failure as opposed to compression. Congrats to Half-eye and Gordon (and you boys win your choice of a cigar or a cupie doll) with honorable mention to Pat B as the break did indeed occur, for the most part, along the run off grain.
Frankly, I always felt a little patronizing when I told people who acquired a bow from me that one of the most important things to never do is bend the bow in the opposite direction (my layman's way of saying "counterflex"). It seems so obvious as something that would be detrimental to the health of the bow. And yet...
Anyway, let this be a good lesson to anyone who might be making a bow for another archer. Give them all the info you can on how the bow can, not only, be preserved, but about how the bow can be damaged as well. And rememeber, even if you do tell them everything...it doesn't mean they'll listen to you.
Oh, the burn...Actually NTD is right in that it wasn't directly involved in the break and it was more to confirm evidence of general misuse. Personally, I think there may be 2 potential explanations here:
1. The owner was thinking about either adding or carving an arrow rest (placement of the burn makes me think along these lines although I am at a loss as to the point of burning through the poly).
Or...
2. If the burn occurred around 4:20 p.m. it could have happened for another reason
and would also explain stringing the bow backwards