Pardon for coming into this debate but might we consider that this is not so much a matter of
whether or not the Ottawa used this style of bow, but
when? It is entirely possible that Rich's Ottawa friend clearly and accurately remembers his tribe using this style bow and could be passed on for a generation or two before that, and this could still be a relatively late adoption to the tribes history, say, within the last 150 years.
While it is much more difficult (and possibly impossible) to prove (or disprove) the use of scallops in Ottawa design before Columbus, we have about as much 'evidence' to prove that they did as much as we do that they did not. We also have to consider that while some Ottawa chose to use the scalloped design, some others did not, preferring a more Seneca-like design. It would be as if two thousand years from now, an archaeologist uncovered a Winchester rifle. He would come to the conclusion that Americans of the Southwest used this design, when in fact plenty of people used Remington shotguns. Ok, maybe a bad example, but I think the point is made anyway. If we found a pile of Ottawa bows buried in a peet bog we might have a better idea of what they used regularly, but we don't have that luxury.
Archaeology is the science of rubbish, and most of it is guess-work after that. Still, this is certainly worth further investigation. I know I'm interested.
Rich, anyone written a doctoral dissertation on Ottawa bows?
Might have to consider this for myself...
Does anyone have a copy of Alleley's
Encyclopedia of Bows, Arrows and Quivers Vol. 1Northeast, Southeast and Midwest? I'm curious to know if they address these bows in that work.
-Doug
PS this prof is about to go on vacation in a couple of days. Wish me and the family a good time and safe journey.