Author Topic: What do YOU consider a "short" bow?  (Read 5008 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rileyconcrete

  • Member
  • Posts: 606
Re: What do YOU consider a "short" bow?
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2009, 03:25:31 pm »
Well I read alot about western indian bows.  I think they only drew to around 23", but most of their bows were sinew backed and about 36-50" long.  I am in the process of making a 40" bow right now and lets just say it is an experiment. I ll let you know.
Tell Riley

Offline cracker

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: What do YOU consider a "short" bow?
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2009, 08:47:10 pm »
anything under 70 is getting really short.
If we can't help each other what is the point of being here?

Offline TheWildCat

  • Member
  • Posts: 105
Re: What do YOU consider a "short" bow?
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2009, 10:26:26 pm »
Anything under 60" is short to me. The shorter they are, the less fergivin to me. And I need a lot a fergivin with my shootin.
"Ifin it Ain't Pork...It Ain't BBQ!!!

TheWildCat

Offline woodstick

  • Member
  • Posts: 899
Re: What do YOU consider a "short" bow?
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2009, 10:44:43 pm »
i have made 2 that are 54" and they are fine at 27 little stacked but they shoot good.
a drawn bow is a stick 9/10 broken