Author Topic: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.  (Read 5039 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« on: July 20, 2009, 08:40:18 pm »
  Tested a couple of Mark St Louis bows today. Shot out of a shooting machine at exactly 28" draw, bows had 10 strand fast flight strings, both bows shot at 10 grains per pound

Self bow recurve 52#@28"   179 fps   elm

Backed recurve bow, 46#@28"  188 fps, ( I believe this is ash backed hornbeam) Mark please edit this if I am wrong.

 I think these two bows are a good place to start keeping records as they will be hard to beat. , we are going to start keeping some records on this at a dedicated records sight. At present this puts mark in the lead for both self bow and backed bows. All challengers welcome ( myself included) Steve
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 11:27:30 pm by Badger »

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2009, 10:56:00 pm »
Steve
The self bow is Elm.  Not the best example but good enough.  The backed bow is Ash backed HHB
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2009, 11:31:23 pm »
Mark, you hear a lot of reports of self bows doing over 180 fps but once strictly tested I haven't seen any yet. The difference between these two bows backed and unbacked is pretty typical for otherwise identical style bows. I took them to full draw several times before testing and all 5 test shots were virtualy identical , no sign of dropping off at all. Steve

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,618
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2009, 11:45:08 pm »
Steve, this is gonna be interesting seeing how wood bows actually perform. Having a standard draw length from a static machine will  really level the playing field.
  Excellent numbers, Marc...but I'm not surprised.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2009, 10:18:34 am »
These tests are not restricted to the higher performance designs like R/D bows and recurves but open to all bows.  This is to see what can be had from optimized bows of all types so people feel free to participate.  I may make another self recurve in the future and submit it for testing, I know the numbers for that class can be easily beaten.
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com

Offline 1/2primitive

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,026
  • Bible believing Christian
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2009, 12:29:53 pm »
This could be fun. :)
I'll be following.
     Sean
Dallas/Fort Worth Tx.

Offline knightd

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,392
    • www.primalneedarchery.com
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2009, 12:42:48 pm »
Badger are we to send the test bows to you? If so send me your addy in a PM..

David

Offline John K

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,936
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2009, 02:04:48 pm »
Good question David.
The only way to fail is to never start !

Offline Marc St Louis

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,877
  • Keep it flexible
    • Marc's Bows and Arrows
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2009, 06:37:16 pm »
Steve is the one doing the testing
Home of heat-treating, Corbeil, On.  Canada

Marc@Ironwoodbowyer.com

Offline hedgeapple

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,835
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2009, 02:21:05 am »
Badger, what a great idea.  I'm going to watch this post.  Thanks for your hard work.
Dave   Richmond, KY
26" draw

Offline Timo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,026
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2009, 08:12:10 am »
So Steve...Just how big of a mail box do you have? ;D Gonna keep the mail man busy I think.

Good on ya for doing this.

Offline ibex

  • Member
  • Posts: 53
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2009, 09:50:51 am »
 I'm reluctant to pitch in here due to my past (and at times current) affiliation with the dark side of synthetic bow testing, but I'll do it anyway. I'm convinced that "Any" durable hunting bow (of any material) that will shoot a 28" long hunting arrow weighing 10 GPP, 180 or more FPS is a very fast bow indeed. Having the opportunity to hunt with Steve's and Marc's bows, I've all but put away my synthetic bows. Steve
𝙄𝙩'𝙨 𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙚.

Offline Badger

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,124
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2009, 12:34:35 pm »
Going to spend the next month doing a move and a bit of remodeling, about the 1 st of september should be able to start doing some testing again. Going to include all different classes seperately and have a misc section for any creative odd ball stuff. Steve

Offline JackCrafty

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 5,628
  • Sorry Officer, I was just gathering "materials".
Re: Tested a couple of Marks Bows.
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2009, 12:35:39 pm »
Awesome....I likes data... ;D ;D
Any critter tastes good with enough butter on it.

Patrick Blank
Midland, Texas
Youtube: JackCrafty, Allergic Hobbit, Patrick Blank

Where's Rock? Public Waterways, Road Cuts, Landscape Supply, Knap-Ins.
How to Cook It?  200° for 24hrs then 275° to 500° for 4hrs (depending on type), Cool for 12hr