RT,
All these boys have been 'round the mulberry bush a few times. I think perhaps what's not being said is "we" generally have all the big adjustments done by about 20" of draw, and are fine tuning the tiller. I for example am more interested in how the bow shoots, and the shape it takes from work fatigue when I get to this stage, because I already have the tiller fairly right and regular.
For the less experienced, yes you want to setup your tillering apparatus to as closely as possilble duplicate your shooting style. So that means putting it on the tree with the draw rope nearer your actual nock point, and the handle fulcrum closer to where you put bow hand pressure.
My tiller tree does not have a "cradle", rather a lag bolt with leather wrap. This gives me a single point of contact and lets the bow rotate on the draw if it wants to. I try to design so the center of gravity of the bow is about where I suspend it from the tree (and obviously where I'll focus my bow hand pressure). For me this is usually dimensional center. I also try to tiller to limit rotation, and believe I am aided by putting the arrow pass at a point which allows me to do the aforementioned, 1/2" to 1" above center. Some people, erroneously in my view, call this a "shorter lower limb" design or "asymetrical" when in fact the opposite is true in reality. For example, if you fold your string together at the nock point on a typical bow, you'll find in most cases the upper segment 2" to 4" shorter than the lower. No wonder the upper limb takes more set....